Google Chrome OS unveiled, released to open source community

Refurbished iPhones for $99 and $199 from AT&T Apple working on gesture control for iPhone keyboard

HDTV screen sizes overreported with misleading "classes"

Digg del.icio.us Facebook StumbleUpon Twitter

Home A/V | by Stephen Schenck | Fri Dec 26, 2008 4:48PM | 0 comments

If you're going shopping for a new TV soon, be sure to pay close attention to the set's specifications versus the advertisements for it. A recent New York Times article is warning that both TV manufacturers and retail stores have been rounding up screen size measurements for their advertisements. While some are quite forthcoming about what they're doing — the article notes Sony and Best Buy as being very cooperative in explaining their practices — the majority of manufacturers and retailers are keeping tight-lipped.

The problem is that sometimes a screen isn't a clean measurement, maybe 31.2 inches or 31.5 inches diagonally instead of 32. Rather than accurately reflect the screen's size in their promotions, the companies will say it's a "32-inch class screen" instead. While this may not seem like a big deal, being cheated a little is still being cheated, and a 31.2-inch screen is a whole twenty-one square inches smaller in area than a 32-inch screen. As screens get larger, you lose more and more space due to these misleading round-ups; the difference in area between a 51.25-inch and 52-inch display is over thirty-three square inches, missing from your screen.

So, what do you do about it? First, be on the lookout for that word "class". Though you won't always see it, it's a clue from some of the more honest companies that they're doing this sort of estimation. Don't be afraid to ask if the screens you're looking at are actually as advertised — if you want to be sure you're not being hoodwinked, a careful consumer could bring along a tape measure for in-store confirmation. If you are interested in buying a TV set that's being misrepresented, you might have a chance at talking the price down. Why should you pay 32-inch prices for what's more closely a 31-inch set?

This story around the web:

Trusted sources:
external link Shrink Ray: NYT Investigates TV Shrink Ray [consumerist.com]
external link The Mysterious Shrinking TV - Bits Blog -… [bits.blogs.nytimes.com]

Get more information on topics relating to this story:


Related company news:
Sony, Best Buy

Comments

Add a comment Inappropriate or promotional comments may be removed.

Add a comment

Click one of the three commenter types below. Member comments are added immediately once you confirm your email address. Anonymous comments are moderated by our editorial staff.

I want to comment as a new member an existing member anonymously

Email me

  

Comment Preview
Anonymous (11:44 AM on Sat Nov 21, 2009)

Preview your comment here.

Inappropriate or promotional comments may be removed. To create a clickable link, simply type the URL (including http://) and we will make a link for you. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags, but if you're into that kind of thing, you can use any of the following tags: b, i, strong, em, a (href only), p and br.